Current:Home > FinanceWithout Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says -Wealth Momentum Network
Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says
Rekubit View
Date:2025-04-09 12:15:51
How would you feel if you and your spouse lost $16,500 in income a year?
That's how much a typical dual-income couple is estimated to lose in Social Security benefits if they retire when the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is depleted in 2033, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said in a new report Thursday. A typical single-income couple would lose $12,400, it said.
Since Social Security is currently paying out more benefits than it's collecting in payroll tax and other revenue, the program is drawing down its reserves in the OASI trust fund to cover the remaining cost of benefits. The fund only has enough reserves to cover 100% of benefits until the fund's reserves are depleted in 2033. When that happens, the law limits benefits to incoming revenue, which essentially mandates a 21% across-the-board benefit cut for the program’s 70 million beneficiaries, CRFB said.
"Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have both said they would “protect” the Social Security program," CRFB said. "However, neither has put forward a plan to meaningfully do so."
Who will be the biggest losers?
Low-income, dual-income couples retiring in 2033 would lose $10,000 in benefits, compared with $21,800 for a high-income couple, CRFB said.
"Although the cut for a low-income couple would be smaller and reflect a 21% reduction in their benefits, the cut would be a larger share of their income," it noted.
Social Security benefits rollercoaster:2025 COLA estimate dips with inflation, but high daily expenses still burn seniors
It'll get worse over time, too
If the government doesn't reform the program, the gap between revenues and benefits paid out will continue to widen, CRFB said. The 21% cut across the board in 2033 will deepen to a 31% cut by 2098, it said.
If Trump also executes his plan to stop taxing Social Security without a plan to fully replace that revenue, the program would be further hamstrung, CRFB said.
Currently, only seniors who earn less than $25,000 per year ($32,000 for married couples) of “combined income" don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Combined income is equal to your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest from instruments like municipal bond investments, plus half of your Social Security benefit.
This year, taxation of benefits is projected to raise about $94 billion, CRFB estimated.
Trump's change would make Social Security’s retirement trust fund insolvent more thanone year earlier – in early 2032 instead of late 2033 -- and the initial 21% cut across the board would deepen to a 25% cut, CRFB said.
“Vague political promises not to touch Social Security benefits are meaningless,” said Mary Johnson, a retired analyst for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, last month. “Voters need to be shown where the money is coming from to pay our benefits."
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at [email protected] and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- What is leap day? Is 2024 a leap year? Everything you need to know about Feb. 29
- Zach Wilson landing spots: Three teams that make sense for Jets QB
- Digital outlets The Intercept, Raw Story and AlterNet sue OpenAI for unauthorized use of journalism
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Family that wanted to build world’s tallest flagpole to pay $250K fine for cabins
- A blender from the 1960s, a restored 1936 piano. What I learned from clearing out my childhood home
- Man gets life in prison after pleading guilty in the sexual assaults of 4 women in their Texas homes
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- NYC Mayor Eric Adams wants changes to sanctuary city laws, increased cooperation with ICE
Ranking
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- 2 buses collide head-on in western Honduras, killing 17 people and injuring 14
- Wind advisories grip the Midwest as storms move east after overnight tornado warnings
- Baby pig that was tossed like a football is adopted and pardoned at Louisiana Capitol
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- French Senate approves a bill to make abortion a constitutional right
- Car theft suspect who fled police outside hospital is spotted, escapes from federal authorities
- Cowboys owner Jerry Jones ordered to take DNA test in paternity case
Recommendation
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
It's not 'all in their head.' Heart disease is misdiagnosed in women. And it's killing us.
13 Travel-Approved Loungewear Sets That Amazon Reviewers Swear By
Gonzaga faces critical weekend that could extend NCAA tournament streak or see bubble burst
Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
Police find bodies of former TV reporter Jesse Baird and partner Luke Davies after alleged killer tells investigators where to look
Caitlin Clark breaks Lynette Woodard's women's scoring record, still chasing Pete Maravich
A pregnant Amish woman was killed in her Pennsylvania home. Police have no suspects.