Current:Home > InvestSupreme Court sides with Native American tribes in health care funding dispute with government -Wealth Momentum Network
Supreme Court sides with Native American tribes in health care funding dispute with government
View
Date:2025-04-19 03:08:59
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court sided with Native American tribes Thursday in a dispute with the federal government over the cost of health care when tribes run programs in their own communities.
The 5-4 decision means the government will cover millions in overhead costs that two tribes faced when they took over running their health care programs under a law meant to give Native Americans more local control.
The Department of Health and Human Services had argued it isn’t responsible for the potentially expensive overhead costs associated with billing insurance companies, Medicare and Medicaid.
The federal Indian Health Service has provided tribal health care since the 1800s under treaty obligations, but the facilities are often inadequate and understaffed, the San Carlos Apache Tribe in Arizona said in court documents.
Health care spending per person by the IHS is just one-third of federal spending in the rest of the country, the Northern Arapaho Tribe in Wyoming said in court documents. Native American tribal populations have an average life expectancy of about 65 years, nearly 11 years less than the U.S. as a whole.
The tribes contracted with IHS to run their own programs ranging from emergency services to substance-abuse treatment. The agency paid the tribes the money it would have spent to run those services, but the contract didn’t include the overhead costs for billing insurance companies or Medicare and Medicaid, since other agencies handle it when the government is running the program.
The tribes, though, had to do the billing themselves. That cost the San Carlos Apache Tribe nearly $3 million in overhead over three years and the Northern Arapaho Tribe $1.5 million over a two-year period, they said. Two lower courts agreed with the tribes.
The Department of Health and Human Services appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that that tribes do get some money for overhead costs but the government isn’t responsible for costs associated with third-party income. The majority of federally recognized tribes now contract with IHS to run at least part of their own health care programming, and reimbursing billing costs for all those programs could total between $800 million and $2 billion per year, the agency said.
veryGood! (3428)
Related
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Gamestop’s annual shareholder meeting disrupted after ‘unprecedented demand’ causes tech issue
- Man dies in apparent hot tub electrocution at Mexico beach resort in Puerto Peñasco
- California Legislature rejects many of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s budget cuts as negotiations continue
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Gov. Hochul considering a face mask ban on New York City subways, citing antisemitic acts
- San Jose Sharks hire Ryan Warsofsky as head coach
- Rihanna Shares Struggles With Postpartum Hair Loss
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Boeing responds to Justice Department’s allegations, says it didn’t violate deferred prosecution agreement
Ranking
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Report: Differences between gay and straight spouses disappear after legalization of gay marriage
- Woman dies while hiking on Colorado trail, prompting heat warning from officials
- Love Is Blind's Taylor Rue Suffers Pregnancy Loss With Boyfriend Cameron Shelton
- Small twin
- Former Illinois men's basketball star Terrence Shannon Jr. found not guilty in rape trial
- Minnesota man who joined Islamic State group is sentenced to 10 years in prison
- 'Once-in-a-lifetime event': Explosion in space to look like new star, NASA says
Recommendation
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
Tony Bennett’s daughters sue their brother over his handling of the late singer’s assets
Camels run loose, stroll Cedar Point theme park after enclosure escape: Watch
The US Supreme Court's ethics are called into question | The Excerpt
Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
How Paul Tremblay mined a lifelong love of scary films to craft new novel 'Horror Movie'
PCE or CPI? US inflation is measured two ways, here's how they compare
Rihanna’s New Fenty Haircare Line Is Officially Out Now—Here’s Why You Need To Try It