Current:Home > NewsWithout Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says -Wealth Momentum Network
Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says
Indexbit View
Date:2025-04-06 19:05:15
How would you feel if you and your spouse lost $16,500 in income a year?
That's how much a typical dual-income couple is estimated to lose in Social Security benefits if they retire when the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is depleted in 2033, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said in a new report Thursday. A typical single-income couple would lose $12,400, it said.
Since Social Security is currently paying out more benefits than it's collecting in payroll tax and other revenue, the program is drawing down its reserves in the OASI trust fund to cover the remaining cost of benefits. The fund only has enough reserves to cover 100% of benefits until the fund's reserves are depleted in 2033. When that happens, the law limits benefits to incoming revenue, which essentially mandates a 21% across-the-board benefit cut for the program’s 70 million beneficiaries, CRFB said.
"Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have both said they would “protect” the Social Security program," CRFB said. "However, neither has put forward a plan to meaningfully do so."
Who will be the biggest losers?
Low-income, dual-income couples retiring in 2033 would lose $10,000 in benefits, compared with $21,800 for a high-income couple, CRFB said.
"Although the cut for a low-income couple would be smaller and reflect a 21% reduction in their benefits, the cut would be a larger share of their income," it noted.
Social Security benefits rollercoaster:2025 COLA estimate dips with inflation, but high daily expenses still burn seniors
It'll get worse over time, too
If the government doesn't reform the program, the gap between revenues and benefits paid out will continue to widen, CRFB said. The 21% cut across the board in 2033 will deepen to a 31% cut by 2098, it said.
If Trump also executes his plan to stop taxing Social Security without a plan to fully replace that revenue, the program would be further hamstrung, CRFB said.
Currently, only seniors who earn less than $25,000 per year ($32,000 for married couples) of “combined income" don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Combined income is equal to your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest from instruments like municipal bond investments, plus half of your Social Security benefit.
This year, taxation of benefits is projected to raise about $94 billion, CRFB estimated.
Trump's change would make Social Security’s retirement trust fund insolvent more thanone year earlier – in early 2032 instead of late 2033 -- and the initial 21% cut across the board would deepen to a 25% cut, CRFB said.
“Vague political promises not to touch Social Security benefits are meaningless,” said Mary Johnson, a retired analyst for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, last month. “Voters need to be shown where the money is coming from to pay our benefits."
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at [email protected] and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
veryGood! (1138)
Related
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- What banks do when no one's watching
- Penalty pain: Players converted just 4 of the first 8 penalty kicks at the Women’s World Cup
- Inside Clean Energy: Denmark Makes the Most of its Brief Moment at the Climate Summit
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- A Federal Judge Wants More Information on Polluting Discharges From Baltimore’s Troubled Sewage Treatment Plants
- Senate Democrats Produce a Far-Reaching Climate Bill, But the Price of Compromise with Joe Manchin is Years More Drilling for Oil and Gas
- 11 horses die in barbaric roundup in Nevada caught on video, showing animals with broken necks
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Florida girl severely burned by McDonald's Chicken McNugget awarded $800,000 in damages
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Am I crossing picket lines if I see a movie? and other Hollywood strike questions
- Shipping Looks to Hydrogen as It Seeks to Ditch Bunker Fuel
- Dancing With the Stars Alum Mark Ballas Expecting First Baby With Wife BC Jean
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Robert Smith of The Cure convinces Ticketmaster to give partial refunds, lower fees
- A Controversial Ruling Puts Maryland’s Utility Companies In Charge Of Billions in Federal Funds
- A Controversial Ruling Puts Maryland’s Utility Companies In Charge Of Billions in Federal Funds
Recommendation
Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
Inside Clean Energy: Indian Point Nuclear Plant Reaches a Contentious End
Warming Trends: Why Walking Your Dog Can Be Bad for the Environment, Plus the Sexism of Climate Change and Taking Plants to the Office
The Bureau of Land Management Lets 1.5 Million Cattle Graze on Federal Land for Almost Nothing, but the Cost to the Climate Could Be High
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
TikTok CEO says company is 'not an agent of China or any other country'
Why Taylor Lautner Doesn't Want a Twilight Reboot
Big Oil’s Top Executives Strike a Common Theme in Testimony on Capitol Hill: It Never Happened
Tags
Like
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Two Lakes, Two Streams and a Marsh Filed a Lawsuit in Florida to Stop a Developer From Filling in Wetlands. A Judge Just Threw it Out of Court
- A 3D-printed rocket launched successfully but failed to reach orbit