Current:Home > ContactFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Wealth Momentum Network
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-12 13:51:38
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (66525)
Related
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Federal judge temporarily blocks Utah social media laws aimed to protect children
- Webcam captures its own fiery demise from spread of Airport Fire: See timelapse footage
- After Taylor Swift post, Caitlin Clark encourages voting but won't endorse Kamala Harris
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- An Ohio city reshaped by Haitian immigrants lands in an unwelcome spotlight
- Hailey Bieber Steps Out for First Time Since Welcoming Baby With Justin Bieber
- Libertarian candidates for Congress will be left off Iowa ballots after final court decision
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Arizona’s 2-page ballots could make for long lines on Election Day
Ranking
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Fed official broke ethics rules but didn’t violate insider trading laws, probe finds
- A Colorado man is charged with arson in a wildfire that destroyed 26 homes
- Kentucky authorities still hunting suspect in I-75 shooting that injured 5
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- Blue Jays pitcher Bowden Francis again loses no-hit bid on leadoff homer in 9th
- Madison LeCroy Says Your Makeup Will Last Until Dawn With This Setting Spray, Even if You Jump in a Lake
- 2024 MTV VMAs: Halsey Teases Marriage to Avan Jogia Amid Engagement Rumors
Recommendation
'Most Whopper
Campbell removing 'soup' from iconic company name after 155 years
Why Travis Kelce Didn't Join Taylor Swift at the 2024 MTV VMAs
The Mississippi River is running low again. It’s a problem for farmers moving beans and grain
The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
Campbell removing 'soup' from iconic company name after 155 years
Indiana judge rules against abortion providers fighting near-total ban
Abortions are down under Florida’s 6-week ban but not by as much as in other states, study says